Ergebnis für URL: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html #[1]alternate [2]English [3]b"lgarski [4]català [5]cestina [6]Deutsch [7]español
[8]français [9]E+B+R+J+T+ [10]hrvatski [11]italiano [12]Nederlands [13]polski
[14]português [15]russkij [16]Türkçe [17]ç¹U81é«U94ä¸æU96U87
[18]Skip to main text
[19]Free Software Supporter: email address_____ Sign up
[20]JOIN THE FSF
[21] [A GNU head] GNU Operating System
Supported by the [22]Free Software Foundation
[23] [Search www.gnu.org]
[24] [Other languages]
[25]Site navigation [26]Skip
* [27]ABOUT GNU
* = [28]PHILOSOPHY =
* [29]LICENSES
* [30]EDUCATION
* [31]SOFTWARE
* [32]DISTROS
* [33]DOCS
* [34]MALWARE
* [35]HELP GNU
* [36]AUDIO & VIDEO
* [37]GNU ART
* [38]FUN
* [39]GNU'S WHO?
* [40]SOFTWARE DIRECTORY
* [41]HARDWARE
* [42]SITEMAP
[43]GNU Home / [44]Philosophy / [45]Essays & articles /
[46]Licensing free software / [47]Copyleft /
Releasing Free Software If You Work at a University
In the free software movement, we believe computer users should have the freedom
to change and redistribute the software that they use. The "free" in "free
software" refers to freedom: it means users have the freedom to run, modify and
redistribute the software. Free software contributes to human knowledge, while
nonfree software does not. Universities should therefore encourage free software
for the sake of advancing human knowledge, just as they should encourage
scientists and other scholars to publish their work.
Alas, many university administrators have a grasping attitude towards software
(and towards science); they see programs as opportunities for income, not as
opportunities to contribute to human knowledge. Free software developers have
been coping with this tendency for almost 20 years.
When I started developing the [48]GNU operating system, in 1984, my first step
was to quit my job at MIT. I did this specifically so that the MIT licensing
office would be unable to interfere with releasing GNU as free software. I had
planned an approach for licensing the programs in GNU that would ensure that all
modified versions must be free software as well--an approach that developed into
the [49]GNU General Public License (GNU GPL)--and I did not want to have to beg
the MIT administration to let me use it.
Over the years, university affiliates have often come to the Free Software
Foundation for advice on how to cope with administrators who see software only as
something to sell. One good method, applicable even for specifically funded
projects, is to base your work on an existing program that was released under the
GNU GPL. Then you can tell the administrators, "We're not allowed to release the
modified version except under the GNU GPL--any other way would be copyright
infringement". After the dollar signs fade from their eyes, they will usually
consent to releasing it as free software.
You can also ask your funding sponsor for help. When a group at NYU developed the
GNU Ada Compiler, with funding from the US Air Force, the contract explicitly
called for donating the resulting code to the Free Software Foundation. Work out
the arrangement with the sponsor first, then politely show the university
administration that it is not open to renegotiation. They would rather have a
contract to develop free software than no contract at all, so they will most
likely go along.
Whatever you do, raise the issue early--well before the program is half finished.
At this point, the university still needs you, so you can play hardball: tell the
administration you will finish the program, make it usable, if they agree in
writing to make it free software (and agree to your choice of free software
license). Otherwise you will work on it only enough to write a paper about it,
and never make a version good enough to release. When the administrators know
their choice is to have a free software package that brings credit to the
university or nothing at all, they will usually choose the former.
The FSF can sometimes persuade your university to accept the GNU General Public
License, or to accept GPL version 3. If you can't do it alone, please give us the
chance to help. Send mail to licensing@fsf.org, and put "urgent" in the Subject
field.
Not all universities have grasping policies. The University of Texas has a policy
that makes it easy to release software developed there as free software under the
GNU General Public License. Univates in Brazil, and the International Institute
of Information Technology in Hyderabad, India, both have policies in favor of
releasing software under the GPL. By developing faculty support first, you may be
able to institute such a policy at your university. Present the issue as one of
principle: does the university have a mission to advance human knowledge, or is
its sole purpose to perpetuate itself?
In persuading the university, it helps to approach the issue with determination
and based on an ethical perspective, as we do in the free software movement. To
treat the public ethically, the software should be free--as in freedom--for the
whole public.
Many developers of free software profess narrowly practical reasons for doing so:
they advocate allowing others to share and change software as an expedient for
making software powerful and reliable. If those values motivate you to develop
free software, well and good, and thank you for your contribution. But those
values do not give you a good footing to stand firm when university
administrators pressure or tempt you to make the program nonfree.
For instance, they may argue that "We could make it even more powerful and
reliable with all the money we can get". This claim may or may not come true in
the end, but it is hard to disprove in advance. They may suggest a license to
offer copies "free of charge, for academic use only," which would tell the
general public they don't deserve freedom, and argue that this will obtain the
cooperation of academia, which is all (they say) you need.
If you start from values of convenience alone, it is hard to make a good case for
rejecting these dead-end proposals, but you can do it easily if you base your
stand on ethical and political values. What good is it to make a program powerful
and reliable at the expense of users' freedom? Shouldn't freedom apply outside
academia as well as within it? The answers are obvious if freedom and community
are among your goals. Free software respects the users' freedom, while nonfree
software negates it.
Nothing strengthens your resolve like knowing that the community's freedom
depends, in one instance, on you.
____________________________________________________________________________
This essay is published in [50]Free Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays
of Richard M. Stallman.
____________________________________________________________________________
[51]^
[52]BACK TO TOP
[53]Set language
Available for this page:
[en] [54]English [bg] [55]b"lgarski [ca] [56]català [cs] [57]cestina
[de] [58]Deutsch [es] [59]español [fr] [60]français [he] [61]E+B+R+J+T+
[hr] [62]hrvatski [it] [63]italiano [nl] [64]Nederlands [pl] [65]polski
[pt-br] [66]português [ru] [67]russkij [tr] [68]Türkçe [zh-tw] [69]
____________________________________________________________________________
[70]BACK TO TOP ^
[71] [FSF logo] "The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a
worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom. We defend the rights of
all software users".
[72]JOIN [73]DONATE [74]SHOP
Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to [75]. There are also
[76]other ways to contact the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or
suggestions can be sent to [77].
Please see the [78]Translations README for information on coordinating and
contributing translations of this article.
Copyright © 2002, 2014, 2021 Richard Stallman
This page is licensed under a [79]Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License.
[80]Copyright Infringement Notification
Updated: $Date: 2021/10/01 17:02:54 $
References
1. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html
2. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.en.html
3. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.bg.html
4. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.ca.html
5. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.cs.html
6. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.de.html
7. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.es.html
8. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.fr.html
9. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.he.html
10. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.hr.html
11. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.it.html
12. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.nl.html
13. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.pl.html
14. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.pt-br.html
15. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.ru.html
16. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.tr.html
17. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.zh-tw.html
18. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#content
19. http://www.fsf.org/fss
20. https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom?referrer=4052
21. http://www.gnu.org/
22. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#mission-statement
23. http://www.gnu.org/cgi-bin/estseek.cgi
24. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#language-container
25. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#navigation
26. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#content
27. http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu.html
28. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html
29. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html
30. http://www.gnu.org/education/education.html
31. http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html
32. http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.html
33. http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html
34. http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary.html
35. http://www.gnu.org/help/help.html
36. http://www.gnu.org/audio-video/audio-video.html
37. http://www.gnu.org/graphics/graphics.html
38. http://www.gnu.org/fun/humor.html
39. http://www.gnu.org/people/people.html
40. http://directory.fsf.org/
41. https://h-node.org/
42. http://www.gnu.org/server/sitemap.html
43. http://www.gnu.org/
44. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html#content
45. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/essays-and-articles.html#content
46. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/essays-and-articles.html#LicensingFreeSoftware
47. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/essays-and-articles.html#copyleft
48. http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html
49. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
50. https://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/
51. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#top
52. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#top
53. http://www.gnu.org/server/select-language.html?callback=/philosophy/university.html
54. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.en.html
55. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.bg.html
56. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.ca.html
57. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.cs.html
58. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.de.html
59. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.es.html
60. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.fr.html
61. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.he.html
62. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.hr.html
63. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.it.html
64. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.nl.html
65. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.pl.html
66. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.pt-br.html
67. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.ru.html
68. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.tr.html
69. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.zh-tw.html
70. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html#header
71. http://www.fsf.org/
72. http://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom?referrer=4052
73. http://donate.fsf.org/
74. http://shop.fsf.org/
75. mailto:gnu@gnu.org
76. http://www.gnu.org/contact/
77. mailto:webmasters@gnu.org
78. http://www.gnu.org/server/standards/README.translations.html
79. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
80. http://www.fsf.org/about/dmca-notice
Usage: http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/URL
e.g. http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/http://www.kk-software.de
Errormessages are in German, sorry ;-)