Ergebnis für URL: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions #[1]Scholarpedia (en) [2]Scholarpedia Atom feed
Help:Frequently Asked Questions
From Scholarpedia
Jump to: [3]navigation, [4]search
See also [5]Help:Contents
Contents
* [6]1 General
+ [7]1.1 What is Scholarpedia?
+ [8]1.2 Why should I devote time and energy to Scholarpedia rather than
Wikipedia?
+ [9]1.3 Is Scholarpedia a journal or an encyclopedia?
+ [10]1.4 How is Scholarpedia funded?
* [11]2 Roles at Scholarpedia
+ [12]2.1 What is an Author?
+ [13]2.2 What is a Curator?
+ [14]2.3 What is a Sponsor?
+ [15]2.4 What is an Article Contributor?
+ [16]2.5 What does an Editor do?
* [17]3 Publication process
+ [18]3.1 What is the publication process?
+ [19]3.2 What does it mean for a Scholarpedia article to get "published"?
+ [20]3.3 How can I start a new article?
+ [21]3.4 How can I find a sponsor?
+ [22]3.5 How are reviewers found?
+ [23]3.6 Who decides which articles will be accepted?
+ [24]3.7 How does semi-anonymous peer-review work?
+ [25]3.8 How does article "Curatorship" work? What if I don't have time
to maintain an article?
+ [26]3.9 I understand that articles are no longer placed in categories.
Is this true?
* [27]4 Formatting
+ [28]4.1 How do I format my article?
+ [29]4.2 Why does my MathJax look bad/weird/italicized?
* [30]5 Integrity
+ [31]5.1 Can anyone approve an edit to a Scholarpedia article?
+ [32]5.2 Won't public reviewers be biased in favor of article approval?
+ [33]5.3 How do we prevent non-notable articles from being accepted?
+ [34]5.4 What prevents Curators from colluding with each other and
producing dozens of potentially bad articles?
+ [35]5.5 What license is my article licensed under?
* [36]6 I want to help!
+ [37]6.1 How can I contribute to the source code?
+ [38]6.2 How can I volunteer to help at Scholarpedia?
* [39]7 FAQs for Assistant Editors
+ [40]7.1 Can I write a biography of any author?
+ [41]7.2 If I have a problem, doubt, or question, whom should I contact?
+ [42]7.3 How do I log in to my Scholarpedia email?
+ [43]7.4 How do I correct a typo or make a minor edit?
+ [44]7.5 How do I add an article to my watchlist?
+ [45]7.6 What is the "My talk" page for?
+ [46]7.7 If I correct a typo or suggest a minor edit, how long will it
take for the change to happen? What happens if I never get a response?
General
What is Scholarpedia?
Scholarpedia brings together the world's most widely-recognized subject experts
to write and curate living topic reviews---in other words, review articles that
are updated periodically as more knowledge about a topic becomes available.
Scholarpedia is written by and for scholars and scientists and, as such, aims to
complement, rather than replace, [47]Wikipedia.
Why should I devote time and energy to Scholarpedia rather than Wikipedia?
In 2012, nearly 2 million scholarly articles were written. Practically all were
by smart, knowledgeable, and well-meaning experts, individuals who were happy to
give their research away because their primary goal has been to get noticed and
read. More than 80,000 of these articles were comprehensive examinations of the
state of the art on a topic within the scholarly literature---i.e., review
articles. After usually months of editorial back-and-forth, these reviews were
published and then immediately became outdated and inaccessible to the people who
funded their writing.
At the same time as academics have literally been giving away their life's work,
the public struggles to get access to up-to-date expert-vetted information. The
state of the art in, for example, medical topics, economics, politics, and legal
fields is diffusely distributed and available only to a privileged few. The
expert consensus on a range of topics of vital importance has been hidden,
allowing special-interest groups and public relations firms to fill the void.
One might hope, given most scholars' motivations for joining Wikipedia, that it
would be a natural venue for scholarly communication. But Wikipedia has not
succeeded in this regard. We believe the reasons for this are two-fold: (1)
Academics participate in a prestige-based economy, and in order to survive
professionally, we must devote our limited time to pursuits for which we can get
professional credit, and (2) Despite a lifetime spent in serious and critical
study, the credibility and reputation academics have earned is worth very little
when contributing in non-scholarly forums.
By contrast, Scholarpedia employs the same basic workflow that academics are
familiar with: A scholarly review article gets written, undergoes peer-review,
and is subsequently published. Like on Wikipedia and unlike in most traditional
journals, the articles are made freely available to the public. The curator of an
article makes and/or vets modifications to it over the long term, ensuring that
the article remains an accurate reflection of the field as it develops.
Furthermore, thanks to Scholarpedia's prominence, an article here is usually
highly ranked in search results whenever its title is queried (e.g. try
[48]hemineglect or [49]Bayesian statistics). Articles at Scholarpedia thus serve
a valuable role online, providing easily accessible information to the public
from those most qualified to disseminate it.
Is Scholarpedia a journal or an encyclopedia?
As a gradually compiled encyclopedia, it is both. Like a journal, it has review
articles that are published on a particular date. Like an encyclopedia, its
articles are intended to be durable and unique within Scholarpedia. It is by
being both a journal and an encyclopedia that Scholarpedia is able to bridge
traditional scholarly publishing with wiki-style collaboration and continuous
incremental development.
How is Scholarpedia funded?
Scholarpedia currently runs on a limited budget that covers basic maintenance and
server costs. This funding is currently provided by [50]Brain Corporation, which
benefits from Scholarpedia's extensive coverage of topics in [51]computational
neuroscience.
Roles at Scholarpedia
What is an Author?
An Author is an individual who has made a substantive contribution to the writing
of an article. The person who proposed an article (or agreed to write an article
proposed by a Curator or Editor) and all of the people who agreed to co-author it
are its authors. All authors' names appear in the article's official citation and
in the article's entry in the Scholarpedia Journal.
What is a Curator?
The [52]Curator of an article is a recognized authority on the article topic and
is the individual ultimately responsible for the accuracy of the article. At time
of publication, the authors must choose the most established expert among them to
act as the article's Curator. Only authors who become Curators gain the ability
to sponsor other new articles in Scholarpedia.
What is a Sponsor?
After proposing an article, authors must request "Sponsorship" from an existing
Scholarpedia Curator in order to reserve the proposed topic. The article's
Sponsor vouches that (1) the article topic is within his/her own expertise, (2)
at least one of the authors is an established expert in the field, and (3) the
topic is encyclopedic and does not duplicate work done elsewhere in Scholarpedia.
What is an Article Contributor?
Any user besides the Curator who has contributed to an article by writing,
sponsoring, reviewing, or successfully editing it immediately becomes an Article
Contributor, or simply "contributor". An article contributor can vote on proposed
revisions, including their own. Any edits to an article by one of its
contributors requires only one additional approval in order for the edit to
eventually become visible to the public.
What does an Editor do?
The Editors at Scholarpedia perform a variety of tasks, including converting
articles to Scholarwiki format, inviting reviewers, and answering users'
questions.
Publication process
What is the publication process?
The steps involved in the publication process are as follows:
1. Create a user account
2. Propose an article
3. Find a sponsor
4. Invite a co-author (optional)
5. Write the article
6. Invite peer reviewers
7. Revise the article
8. Approve the article for publication
For more detailed information, please see the [53]instructions for authors.
What does it mean for a Scholarpedia article to get "published"?
Publication in Scholarpedia occurs after an article has both passed peer-review
and the latest version has been approved by the authors. When an article is
published, it is assigned a [54]DOI and will then appear in that month's
[55]Scholarpedia Journal (ISSN 1941-6016). Subsequent revisions are vetted by the
article's Curator, an established expert on the topic.
Scholarpedia's publication model aims to provide flexibility, allowing the
process to be driven by Editors (the method traditionally used within scholarly
publishing), by the article's authors themselves, or by a combination of both
parties. What makes this possible is Scholarpedia's use of [56]"semi-anonymous
peer review", in which the identities of whomever approves an article for
publication is public, while article rejection is done anonymously and with
plausible deniability.
How can I start a new article?
In order to avoid the editorial bottlenecks associated with traditional scholarly
publication, Scholarpedia employs a more flexible publishing model. Articles can
begin in one of two ways: (1) An Editor can invite a scholar to author an article
on a particular topic, or (2) a Scholarpedia user can propose to write an article
him or herself, by clicking on "Propose a new article" and then following the
instructions there.
How can I find a sponsor?
Please see Step 3 of the [57]instructions for authors.
How are reviewers found?
Who decides which articles will be accepted?
Article acceptance is decided, essentially, by the existing base of Scholarpedia
Curators. The article is accepted if two curators accept it and no editors or
invited reviewers reject it.
How does semi-anonymous peer-review work?
Reviewer anonymity is a key aspect of traditional peer-review, permitting
reviewers to criticize freely without fear of retribution. However, in order to
allow us to avoid the constraints of a "top down" Editor-driven encyclopedia,
Scholarpedia relies on Curators publicly vouching for article topics and
contents. Our challenge has been to develop a system that allows reviewers to
comment anonymously and reject articles when necessary without requiring the
involvement of an editor.
Thus, all reviewer involvement is, by default, public and fully attributed. When
the need arises for anonymous criticism or article rejection, the following
provides reviewers with plausible deniability:
* Article rejection is anonymous.
* Article rejection can be performed by any Scholarpedia editor, as well as any
individual invited to review an article.
* Any individual invited to review an article can invite any other individual
to review the same article.
* If a reviewer (or any person, for that matter) should like to comment
anonymously on an article, they need only contact a Scholarpedia Editor and
have this person relay the reviewer's comments.
How does article "Curatorship" work? What if I don't have time to maintain an article?
After publication, articles can be revised to reflect advances in the field, with
revisions ultimately under the control of the article's [58]Curator. Articles can
still be edited by any Scholarpedia user, however these edits are only visible
once they have been approved.
All those who have successfully edited an article become Contributors to the
article. After publication, edits need the unanimous approval of [59]at least two
of the article contributors, or [60]approval from the article's Curator. If a
Curator rejects a revision, the revision remains hidden, visible within the
article's history but not appearing in the article's main text.
Whether article Curators choose to engage frequently or rarely to article
maintenance, the article's community of Contributors is motivated to as closely
as possible reflect the judgment of the Curator: Contributors receive credit
whenever their evaluation of an article matches the final evaluation of the
revision (by the Curator or community), and a Contributor receives a small
penalty when their evaluation is at odds with that of the Curator. Thus, even a
Curator who engages only rarely with an article can be assured that his or her
influence nonetheless persists.
I understand that articles are no longer placed in categories. Is this true?
No, categories remain, and Editors remain responsible for them, however formal
Editor privileges are no longer tied to a particular category. Rather than impose
restrictions, we have decide to trust our Editors to respect each other's
projects.
Formatting
How do I format my article?
Please see [61]Help:Wikitext formatting.
Why does my MathJax look bad/weird/italicized?
If you're using OS X and Lion, this is a known problem. The easiest way to fix it
is to open Font Book in OS X, select all the STIX fonts, disable them, and then
restart your browser. The equations will then look beautiful.
Integrity
Can anyone approve an edit to a Scholarpedia article?
Yes -- new Scholarpedia uses a "What Would Curator Do?" (WWCD) philosophy for
each article. Anyone who successfully contributes to an article becomes a
contributor and is able to approve or reject proposed article revisions.
Contributors are ranked for correctly predicting whether a revision is eventually
approved or rejected -- and the article Curator has the final say. If a
contributor's predictions of edit outcome are wrong more often than right, then
the contributor loses the ability to approve or reject future revisions.
Contributor status can be regained by submitting an edit to the article that ends
up being approved.
Won't public reviewers be biased in favor of article approval?
Those invited to review and approve an article can see the article before they
agree to participate, and thus if they believe an article is not of sufficient
quality, they can graciously decline to review it instead of rejecting it. If
they do choose to reject it, they can do so anonymously, and since "rejection"
consists only of reverting the article to its pre-Sponsored stage, the
consequences of rejection are relatively minor, minimizing disincentives to do
so. Article reviewers are also free to invite any individual whom they trust to
participate in the review process anonymously, and by doing so, give this other
individual the ability to reject the article, too.
Indeed, public approval usefully constrains both authors and reviewers: article
authors are incentivized to only invite reviewers who will add credibility to the
authors' work, and article reviewers are incentivized to avoid approving articles
that are poor by a desire to preserve their reputation.
How do we prevent non-notable articles from being accepted?
The requirement of sponsorship and review helps assure article notability, which
is strengthened by the possibility that an article may be rejected anonymously.
Notability is further assured through accountability: article sponsors and
authors are listed at the bottom of each article, so that their reputation
validates the article.
What prevents Curators from colluding with each other and producing dozens of
potentially bad articles?
For the time being, it is the responsibility of Scholarpedia Editors to prevent
this from occurring. In the longer-term, a number of different possible
mechanisms can be employed to mitigate such problems.
What license is my article licensed under?
Your article will be licensed under a [62]Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license.
Though the [63]Terms of Use have the final say, in sum this license means that
the article can be used by anyone else, provided that it is properly attributed
(including a hyperlink online), its use is not primarily commercial, and
modifications to it are similarly licensed
I want to help!
How can I contribute to the source code?
Because this project is still very experimental, source code development (PHP,
MySQL, MediaWiki) is proceeding privately, but we hope to open development to the
public at some point in the future.
How can I volunteer to help at Scholarpedia?
If you would like to volunteer, please send an email to support@scholarpedia.org.
FAQs for Assistant Editors
Can I write a biography of any author?
You may only write biographies of authors who have published an article in
Scholarpedia.
If I have a problem, doubt, or question, whom should I contact?
When you first receive email confirmation that you are officially an Assistant
Editor, you should also have been told the name and email of your supervisor.
This person will be able to advise you on any matter. If you have forgotten the
name of your supervisor or do not know who to contact, you may send an email to
support@scholarpedia.org.
How do I log in to my Scholarpedia email?
There is no more Scholarpedia email. All communications regarding Scholarpedia
should preferably be made through your academic email.
How do I correct a typo or make a minor edit?
Click on the "Edit" button, above the article and to the left of the Scholarpedia
search bar and edit the text appropriately. When finished, tick "this is a minor
edit" at the bottom and then "show preview". Once you are happy with the way
things look, scroll down again and click "save page". Click "view history", next
to the search bar, and then "request approval" next to your modification.
How do I add an article to my watchlist?
To quickly add an article to your watchlist, go to the article and click on the
blue star located in the upper right of the page (next to the search box). To
manage your watchlist either click on the "My watchlist" link located above the
blue button, or navigate to
[64]http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Watchlist. Next, click on either
the "View and edit watchlist" link
([65]http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:EditWatchlist), or the "Edit raw
watchlist" link
([66]http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:EditWatchlist/raw).
What is the "My talk" page for?
Currently, the page is being used for the posting of reviews, and for the
occasional proposed correction.
Hopefully, however, the talk pages will be made much more useful, and perhaps
even serve as a platform of scholarly discussion regarding the current state of
knowledge on a particular topic.
If I correct a typo or suggest a minor edit, how long will it take for the change to
happen? What happens if I never get a response?
Though there are no guarantees that a proposed revision will be accepted, by
having both [67]implicit and [68]explicit revision approval, we hope to minimize
the chance that a revision will be ignored.
Also, it's important to keep in mind that research is a social enterprise: if the
Curator doesn't notice a revision, and you think it's an important one, you
should feel free to contact other people who have contributed to the article's
development. For example, you might contact the article's Sponsor or Reviewer
with your concern.
Retrieved from
"[69]http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Question
s&oldid=184397"
Personal tools
* [70]Log in
Namespaces
* [71]Help page
* [72]Discussion
Variants
Views
* [73]Read
* [74]View source
* [75]View history
Actions
Search
____________________ (BUTTON) Search
Navigation
* [76]Main page
* [77]About
* [78]Propose a new article
* [79]Instructions for Authors
* [80]Random article
* [81]FAQs
* [82]Help
Focal areas
* [83]Astrophysics
* [84]Celestial mechanics
* [85]Computational neuroscience
* [86]Computational intelligence
* [87]Dynamical systems
* [88]Physics
* [89]Touch
* [90]More topics
Activity
* [91]Recently published articles
* [92]Recently sponsored articles
* [93]Recent changes
* [94]All articles
* [95]List all Curators
* [96]List all users
* [97]Scholarpedia Journal
Tools
* [98]What links here
* [99]Related changes
* [100]Special pages
* [101]Printable version
* [102]Permanent link
* [103][twitter.png?303]
* [104][gplus-16.png]
* [105][facebook.png?303]
* [106][linkedin.png?303]
* [107]Powered by MediaWiki [108]Powered by MathJax [109]Creative Commons
License
* This page was last modified on 21 September 2017, at 04:31.
* This page has been accessed 186,020 times.
* [110]Privacy policy
* [111]About Scholarpedia
* [112]Disclaimers
References
Visible links:
1. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/opensearch_desc.php
2. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom
3. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#mw-head
4. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#p-search
5. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Contents
6. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#General
7. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_Scholarpedia.3F
8. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_should_I_devote_time_and_energy_to_Scholarpedia_rather_than_Wikipedia.3F
9. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Is_Scholarpedia_a_journal_or_an_encyclopedia.3F
10. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_is_Scholarpedia_funded.3F
11. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Roles_at_Scholarpedia
12. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_an_Author.3F
13. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_a_Curator.3F
14. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_a_Sponsor.3F
15. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_an_Article_Contributor.3F
16. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_does_an_Editor_do.3F
17. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Publication_process
18. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_the_publication_process.3F
19. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_does_it_mean_for_a_Scholarpedia_article_to_get_.22published.22.3F
20. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_can_I_start_a_new_article.3F
21. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_can_I_find_a_sponsor.3F
22. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_are_reviewers_found.3F
23. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Who_decides_which_articles_will_be_accepted.3F
24. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_does_semi-anonymous_peer-review_work.3F
25. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_does_article_.22Curatorship.22_work.3F_What_if_I_don.27t_have_time_to_maintain_an_article.3F
26. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#I_understand_that_articles_are_no_longer_placed_in_categories._Is_this_true.3F
27. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Formatting
28. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_format_my_article.3F
29. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_does_my_MathJax_look_bad.2Fweird.2Fitalicized.3F
30. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Integrity
31. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_anyone_approve_an_edit_to_a_Scholarpedia_article.3F
32. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Won.27t_public_reviewers_be_biased_in_favor_of_article_approval.3F
33. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_we_prevent_non-notable_articles_from_being_accepted.3F
34. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_prevents_Curators_from_colluding_with_each_other_and_producing_dozens_of_potentially_bad_articles.3F
35. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_license_is_my_article_licensed_under.3F
36. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#I_want_to_help.21
37. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_can_I_contribute_to_the_source_code.3F
38. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_can_I_volunteer_to_help_at_Scholarpedia.3F
39. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#FAQs_for_Assistant_Editors
40. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_write_a_biography_of_any_author.3F
41. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#If_I_have_a_problem.2C_doubt.2C_or_question.2C_whom_should_I_contact.3F
42. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_log_in_to_my_Scholarpedia_email.3F
43. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_correct_a_typo_or_make_a_minor_edit.3F
44. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_add_an_article_to_my_watchlist.3F
45. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_the_.22My_talk.22_page_for.3F
46. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions#If_I_correct_a_typo_or_suggest_a_minor_edit.2C_how_long_will_it_take_for_the_change_to_happen.3F_What_happens_if_I_never_get_a_response.3F
47. http://en.wikipedia.org/
48. http://www.google.com/search?q=hemineglect
49. http://www.google.com/search?q=Bayesian+statistics
50. http://www.braincorporation.com/
51. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia_of_Computational_Neuroscience
52. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Curator
53. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Instructions_for_authors
54. http://www.doi.org/
55. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Journal
56. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Peer-review
57. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Instructions_for_authors
58. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Curator
59. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Implicit_approval
60. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Explicit_approval
61. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Wikitext_formatting
62. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en_US
63. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Terms_of_use
64. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Watchlist
65. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:EditWatchlist
66. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:EditWatchlist/raw
67. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Implicit_approval
68. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Implicit_approval
69. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions&oldid=184397
70. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Help%3AFrequently+Asked+Questions
71. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
72. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions
73. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
74. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions&action=edit
75. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions&action=history
76. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Main_Page
77. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:About
78. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:ProposeArticle
79. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Instructions_for_Authors
80. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Random
81. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
82. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Help
83. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Astrophysics
84. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Celestial_Mechanics
85. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Computational_neuroscience
86. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Computational_intelligence
87. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Dynamical_systems
88. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Physics
89. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Encyclopedia:Touch
90. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Topics
91. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:RecentlyPublished
92. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:RecentlySponsored
93. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:RecentChanges
94. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:AllPages
95. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:ListCurators
96. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:ListUsers
97. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Journal
98. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:WhatLinksHere/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
99. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
100. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:SpecialPages
101. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions&printable=yes
102. http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions&oldid=184397
103. https://twitter.com/scholarpedia
104. https://plus.google.com/112873162496270574424
105. http://www.facebook.com/Scholarpedia
106. http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Scholarpedia-4647975/about
107. http://www.mediawiki.org/
108. http://www.mathjax.org/
109. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en_US
110. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:Privacy_policy
111. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:About
112. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia:General_disclaimer
Hidden links:
114. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
115. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Help:Frequently_Asked_Questions
116. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Main_Page
Usage: http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/URL
e.g. http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/http://www.kk-software.de
Errormessages are in German, sorry ;-)