Ergebnis für URL: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HOMUNCUL.html [1]Principia Cybernetica Web
The Homunculus problem
Cartesian materialism is an attempt to keep the mechanistic metaphysics of
Descartes while getting rid of the idea on an immaterial soul ([2]dualism). In
this philosophy, the mind is seen as a (material) component of the body (e.g. the
brain or some component of it) that interacts with the world via the senses and
muscles. The philosopher Daniel Dennett has proposed the term "Cartesian theater"
to summarize the picture that results when this idea is combined with the
reflection-correspondence perspective: the mind somehow sits in a theater where
the incoming perceptions are projected as images onto a screen; it looks at them,
interprets them, and decides what to do; it sends its decisions as commands to
the muscles for execution. In a more modern metaphor, we would describe the
situation as if the mind acts as a control center for the body, the way an air
traffic controller keeps track of the incoming planes on a radar screen,
analyzing the situation, and issuing directions to the pilots. While this picture
may seem more satisfying to a scientifically trained mind than Descartes' ghostly
soul, it merely shifts the difficulty.
The fundamental problem with the mind as control center is that it is equivalent
to a homunculus (diminutive of the Latin "homo" = human being): a little person
watching the theater inside our brain, and reasoning like an intelligent being in
order to deal with the situation it observes. However, the point of the exercise
was precisely to explain how a person reasons! We have explained the mind simply
by postulating another, "smaller" mind (homunculus) within the mind.
Such reasoning leads to an infinite regress. Indeed, to explain how the
homunculus functions we must assume that it has a mind, which itself implies
another homunculus inside it, which must contain yet another homunculus, and so
on. It is as if we are opening a series of Russian dolls the one nested into the
other one, without ever coming to the last one. Another way to illustrate the
circularity of such reasoning would be to consider a recipe for making cake where
one of the ingredients is cake: how can you ever prepare such a cake if you don't
already know how to do it? To evade this paradox, we need to make a radical break
with the way of thinking that produced it.
The need for a systems view
To stop such an infinite regress, we need to posit a place where it ends: the
component of our brain where consciousness resides and where rational decisions
are made. But unless we go back to Cartesian [3]dualism, and postulate a
mysterious, ungraspable soul, we will not find such a place where the outside
world ends and the true mind begins. Indeed trying to pinpoint the place where
decisions are made, we still come to the conclusion that that place must be able
to perceive what is going on outside of itself, and therefore that it must have a
seat in the theater, bringing us back to the homunculus reasoning.
The attempt to situate the mind in a specific place or separate component is a
remnant of reductionism, the philosophy that explains all phenomena by analyzing
them into separate parts, and then determining the properties of the parts. We
should understand the mind not as a collection of parts, but as a whole, which is
distributed over many components. It is not located in any one of them, but in
the network of their relations or interconnections. Different parts of cognitive
processes take place in different parts of the network, but there is no single
part where everything comes together, no "seat of the soul". We should also
accept that there is no one-to-one [4]correspondence between mental and physical
components: the mind as a whole stands in a complex relationship to the world as
a whole. Mental components do not behave like static, independent objects. They
are part of a dynamic network of relationships: a process. Such a holistic and
dynamic perspective requires a new scientific worldview, which we can find in
[5]evolutionary cybernetics.
____________________________________________________________________________
[6]CopyrightŠ 2007 Principia Cybernetica - [7]Referencing this page
Author
Date
Jul 6, 2007
[8]Home
[up.gif]
[9]Introduction to Principia Cybernetica
[up.gif]
[10]Philosophy, Introduction
[up.gif]
[11]Epistemology, introduction
Up
[12]Prev. [4arrows.gif] [13]Next
Down
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
[14]Discussion
____________________________________________________________________________
[15]Add comment...
[space.gif]
References
1. LYNXIMGMAP:http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HOMUNCUL.html#PCP-header
2. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/DUALISM.html
3. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/DUALISM.html
4. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/REFCORR.html
5. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EVOLCYB.html
6. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/COPYR.html
7. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/REFERPCP.html
8. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/DEFAULT.html
9. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/INTRO.html
10. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/PHILOSI.html
11. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html
12. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/DUALISM.html
13. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/METAPHI.html
14. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MAKANNOT.html
15. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/hypercard.acgi$annotform?
[USEMAP]
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HOMUNCUL.html#PCP-header
1. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/DEFAULT.html
2. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HOWWEB.html
3. http://pcp.lanl.gov/HOMUNCUL.html
4. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HOMUNCUL.html
5. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SERVER.html
6. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/hypercard.acgi$randomlink?searchstring=.html
7. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/RECENT.html
8. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/TOC.html#HOMUNCUL
9. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SEARCH.html
Usage: http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/URL
e.g. http://www.kk-software.de/kklynxview/get/http://www.kk-software.de
Errormessages are in German, sorry ;-)